Topic 1

The concept of digital “visitors” and “residents” originally seemed like a new concept that I was unaware of. Through my readings and research I found I was more aware of the subject and began to draw connections to my own life.

Prensky (2001) defines digital “residents” or “immigrants” as a set of people who are learning and developing their online skills. As these “immigrants” do not immerse themselves in modern technologies they do not necessarily possess the skills that are increasingly being brought to the forefront of daily life. Prensky also discussed how these “immigrants” may have an “accent”. This accent demonstrates that they’re still not completely sold by the internet and may instead choose to use other reference materials to gain knowledge.

The concept of a digital “visitor” was also described by Prensky as being someone who is constantly present in technology. These “natives” are also seen not to have an “accent” but to be a “native speaker”. Much like natives in other aspects of life they pick up new skills and norms quicker than immigrants do as many were born into and surrounded by the internet.

In my own life I can relate to the concept of “visitors” and “residents”. I am constantly logged into forms of social media such as Facebook and my first instinct when searching for information is to Google the question. I am aware of other people however who were not born in an era where technology was so readily available and they simply use the internet as a method of gaining quick information or to compete a task. These people may also find themselves using the internet as a second or third option to resources such as books or asking for advice. White & Cornu (2011) made the metaphor of online “visitors” using the internet as an “untidy garden tool shed” where they occasionally visit to help them with a problem or project. This is the opposite of a resident who is constantly engaged with the internet.

Overall although I agree with the idea that some people are more involved with the internet than others I think it is important to realise that although someone is considered a “resident” it does not mean they are fluent in every online skill. Therefore there are different levels of “visitor” and “resident” so it is not correct to brand everyone with one of the two labels.

 

Word count: 400

References:

White, D. S., & Cornu, A. L. (2011). Visitors and Residents: A new typology for online engagement. First Monday, 16(9).

Prensky, M. (2001) Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1, On the Horizon, 9 (5), pp. 1-6

 

Advertisements

One thought on “Topic 1

  1. Hi Tom, I liked reading your blog and thought that you described the concept of digital visitors and residents well. All the points you’ve made I agree with, especially about people being on different levels of he continuum.
    However, linking with your last comment: do you think that digital visitors are capable of developing their digital literacy skills which makes them become more of a resident? Or do you think that they’ll always have an “accent” when it comes to the web?

    Nicole

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s